SalaryCPA Research · State comparison

Minnesota vs South Dakota: CPA salary compared

Which state pays CPAs more — Minnesota or South Dakota? We put the verified BLS medians for accountants side by side, then adjust each for local prices to show where a paycheck actually stretches further.

Minnesota · real pay

$82,760

BEA-adjusted · nominal $81.6K

South Dakota · real pay

$89,030

BEA-adjusted · nominal $78.9K

Higher on paper

Minnesota

+$2.7K nominal median

Higher buying power

South Dakota

flips after cost of living

Nominal: verified BLS OEWS May 2025 (Accountants & Auditors, SOC 13-2011) · Real pay = nominal ÷ (RPP ÷ 100), BEA Regional Price Parities 2024 · Real pay is BEA-adjusted, not take-home.

Does Minnesota or South Dakota pay CPAs more?

Minnesota pays more on paper, but once local prices are accounted for, South Dakota delivers the higher buying power — a case where the headline number and the real answer disagree.

Nominal medians are verified BLS OEWS May 2025 wages for accountants and auditors. Real pay is BEA-adjusted (RPP 2024), not take-home.

Cost of living flips the answer

Minnesota pays more on paper — $81,600 vs $78,880, a $2.7K edge. But once local prices are accounted for, South Dakota stretches further: $89,030 in buying-power-adjusted pay vs $82,760 — a $6.3K real-pay swing the headline number hides.

This is a case where the headline salary and the real answer disagree. A bigger number on the offer letter does not always mean more money in practice.

Head to head

Minnesota vs South Dakota, side by side

Each state's verified nominal median next to its buying-power-adjusted (real) pay. The gray bar is the headline wage; the accent bar is what it's worth once local prices are applied.

Real pay · BEA-adjusted
Minnesota-14 places
Nominal$81,600
Buying-power adjusted$82,760

Nominal

$81.6K

Price level

98.6/100

Real pay

$82.8K

Local prices run 1% below the national average, so some of that pay is absorbed by higher local costs — Minnesota slips 14 places once adjusted for buying power.

South Dakota+19 places
Nominal$78,880
Buying-power adjusted$89,030

Nominal

$78.9K

Price level

88.6/100

Real pay

$89K

Local prices run 11% below the national average, so pay here stretches further than the headline suggests — South Dakota rises 19 places once adjusted for buying power.

The numbers

Full comparison

Every figure below is passed straight from the data layer — nominal wages are the verified BLS measurement; real pay is nominal ÷ (RPP/100).

CPA and accountant pay compared: Minnesota vs South Dakota.
MetricMinnesotaSouth Dakota
Nominal medianverified BLS$81,600$78,880
Typical range25th–75th pct$68.2K – $105K$67K – $97.9K
Price levelBEA RPP · US avg = 10098.688.6
Real pay (median)BEA-adjusted$82,760$89,030
Nominal rankof 51#18#31
Real-pay rankof 51#32#12
Rank shiftnominal → real-14 places+19 places
Nominal = verified BLS OEWS May 2025 median for Accountants & Auditors (SOC 13-2011). Price level = BEA RPP 2024 (U.S. average = 100). Real pay = nominal ÷ (RPP/100). Accent marks the higher figure per row (lower price level and lower rank number are better).

How to read this

Minnesota or South Dakota: which should a CPA choose?

Pay is one input, not the decision. Here is what these numbers do — and do not — tell you.

What the numbers show

Minnesota has the higher headline median ($81.6K vs $78.9K). South Dakota wins on buying power once local prices are applied.

What they do not show

Real pay is not take-home. It excludes federal and state income taxes, housing choices, commuting, childcare, and benefits — all of which can move the real answer for your situation.

Buying power is one lens

A state can win on real pay and still be the worse move for you — job density, industry mix, firm presence, taxes, family, and climate all matter. We do not name a "best" state.

BLS measures accountants, not CPAs

These are wages for the broad "Accountants and Auditors" occupation. Licensed CPAs are a subset who typically earn above these medians; the license premium is a separate modeled estimate, not applied here.

Go deeper

Full state guides

Each comparison is a summary. Open a state's full guide for percentiles, top metros, pay by role and experience, and the calculator.

Keep comparing

Minnesota vs South Dakota — FAQ

Does Minnesota or South Dakota pay CPAs more?
Minnesota has the higher headline (nominal) median for accountants and auditors — about $81,600 vs $78,880 in South Dakota, a gap of roughly $2,720 (+3.4%). These are BLS-measured wages for the broad "Accountants and Auditors" occupation; BLS does not publish a CPA-specific figure, so the CPA license premium is a separate estimate.
Is Minnesota or South Dakota better after cost of living?
South Dakota. This is the pair's twist: Minnesota pays more on paper, but once local prices are applied, South Dakota's pay stretches further — about $89,030 in buying-power-adjusted (real) pay vs $82,760. Real pay = nominal ÷ (RPP ÷ 100), using the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis's Regional Price Parities (2024).
Is this take-home pay?
No. Both the nominal and the real (BEA-adjusted) figures are gross wages. Real pay restates the wage in national-average price terms to compare buying power across markets — it does not model federal or state income taxes, housing, commuting, or benefits. No-income-tax states, for example, can stretch a paycheck further than this adjustment alone shows.
Where do these numbers come from?
The nominal medians are the verified BLS OEWS May 2025 wages for Accountants and Auditors (SOC 13-2011) in each state. The price adjustment uses the BEA Regional Price Parities (2024) from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2024). Real pay is a derived combination of the two, not a survey measurement.

Last updated June 2026 · Nominal medians are verified BLS OEWS May 2025(Accountants & Auditors, SOC 13-2011) · Real pay is BEA-adjusted (derived), not a BLS measurement and not take-home pay · Prices: BEA RPP 2024.

Model your own number in Minnesota or South Dakota

Set your role, experience, license, and employer to get a tailored estimate, then read it against the cost-of-living picture above.