SalaryCPA Research · State comparison
Massachusetts vs Washington: CPA salary compared
Which state pays CPAs more — Massachusetts or Washington? We put the verified BLS medians for accountants side by side, then adjust each for local prices to show where a paycheck actually stretches further.
Massachusetts · real pay
$94,010
BEA-adjusted · nominal $99.5K
Washington · real pay
$90,230
BEA-adjusted · nominal $96.6K
Higher on paper
Massachusetts
+$2.9K nominal median
Higher buying power
Massachusetts
same as headline
Nominal: verified BLS OEWS May 2025 (Accountants & Auditors, SOC 13-2011) · Real pay = nominal ÷ (RPP ÷ 100), BEA Regional Price Parities 2024 · Real pay is BEA-adjusted, not take-home.
Does Massachusetts or Washington pay CPAs more?
Nominal medians are verified BLS OEWS May 2025 wages for accountants and auditors. Real pay is BEA-adjusted (RPP 2024), not take-home.
Head to head
Massachusetts vs Washington, side by side
Each state's verified nominal median next to its buying-power-adjusted (real) pay. The gray bar is the headline wage; the accent bar is what it's worth once local prices are applied.
Nominal
$99.5K
Price level
105.8/100
Real pay
$94K
Local prices run 6% above the national average, so buying-power-adjusted pay tracks close to the nominal figure in Massachusetts.
Nominal
$96.6K
Price level
107/100
Real pay
$90.2K
Local prices run 7% above the national average, so some of that pay is absorbed by higher local costs — Washington slips 3 places once adjusted for buying power.
The numbers
Full comparison
Every figure below is passed straight from the data layer — nominal wages are the verified BLS measurement; real pay is nominal ÷ (RPP/100).
| Metric | Massachusetts | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal medianverified BLS | $99,460 | $96,550 |
| Typical range25th–75th pct | $79.4K – $128.6K | $79.2K – $122.5K |
| Price levelBEA RPP · US avg = 100 | 105.8 | 107 |
| Real pay (median)BEA-adjusted | $94,010 | $90,230 |
| Nominal rankof 51 | #4 | #8 |
| Real-pay rankof 51 | #6 | #11 |
| Rank shiftnominal → real | -2 places | -3 places |
How to read this
Massachusetts or Washington: which should a CPA choose?
Pay is one input, not the decision. Here is what these numbers do — and do not — tell you.
What the numbers show
Massachusetts has the higher headline median ($99.5K vs $96.6K). Massachusetts leads on buying power too, so the headline and cost-of-living answers agree.
What they do not show
Real pay is not take-home. It excludes federal and state income taxes, housing choices, commuting, childcare, and benefits — all of which can move the real answer for your situation.
Buying power is one lens
A state can win on real pay and still be the worse move for you — job density, industry mix, firm presence, taxes, family, and climate all matter. We do not name a "best" state.
BLS measures accountants, not CPAs
These are wages for the broad "Accountants and Auditors" occupation. Licensed CPAs are a subset who typically earn above these medians; the license premium is a separate modeled estimate, not applied here.
Go deeper
Full state guides
Each comparison is a summary. Open a state's full guide for percentiles, top metros, pay by role and experience, and the calculator.
Keep comparing
Massachusetts vs Washington — FAQ
- Does Massachusetts or Washington pay CPAs more?
- Massachusetts has the higher headline (nominal) median for accountants and auditors — about $99,460 vs $96,550 in Washington, a gap of roughly $2,910 (+3.0%). These are BLS-measured wages for the broad "Accountants and Auditors" occupation; BLS does not publish a CPA-specific figure, so the CPA license premium is a separate estimate.
- Is Massachusetts or Washington better after cost of living?
- Massachusetts leads on buying-power-adjusted pay too — about $94,010 vs $90,230. In this pair the headline number and the cost-of-living-adjusted answer agree.
- Is this take-home pay?
- No. Both the nominal and the real (BEA-adjusted) figures are gross wages. Real pay restates the wage in national-average price terms to compare buying power across markets — it does not model federal or state income taxes, housing, commuting, or benefits. No-income-tax states, for example, can stretch a paycheck further than this adjustment alone shows.
- Where do these numbers come from?
- The nominal medians are the verified BLS OEWS May 2025 wages for Accountants and Auditors (SOC 13-2011) in each state. The price adjustment uses the BEA Regional Price Parities (2024) from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2024). Real pay is a derived combination of the two, not a survey measurement.
Last updated June 2026 · Nominal medians are verified BLS OEWS May 2025(Accountants & Auditors, SOC 13-2011) · Real pay is BEA-adjusted (derived), not a BLS measurement and not take-home pay · Prices: BEA RPP 2024.
Model your own number in Massachusetts or Washington
Set your role, experience, license, and employer to get a tailored estimate, then read it against the cost-of-living picture above.